This is not an 8 core processor in the meaning of what marketing has done and some misleading to those people that don't understand the architecture. THIS IS A 4 CORE PROCESSOR WITH 4 PHYSICAL HYPER THREADING INTEGER CORES. the 2 integer cores of bulldozer only equals up to one intel integer core. bulldozer released, but something is wrong, the numbers are all over the place scoring better on one site then flopping on another, scoring decent and flopping another... as some people noticed it out scored a 2500k 60% of tests on ASROCK Fatality board, it also outscored the 2600k 30% of the time. All the ASUS board numbers are all over the place. sorry intel fan boys it's most likely that its a simple bios fix. Every test done that was not on an the CHV faired better scores than a 2600k and couldn't always beat the 2500k(single threaded apps)big deal in my opinion as when it came down to clowning intel was multitasking and intel severely got owned where they usually win. especially when this is absolutely new architecture ahead of its time(almost a full year) there is also a little known cache thrashing(software optimizations needed) clearly AMD is on track just little tweaks and improvements could get us an astoung first gen chip. Windows patches and bios updates may improve by total estimation of 5-7% more per core. a total of processor work would also be in the same improvement range. I did not expect this to absolutely kill on it's first outing. you could even consider ...
AMD Bulldozer- Makes bridges fall
Monday, October 8, 2012
AMD Bulldozer- Makes bridges fall Video Clips. Duration : 2.62 Mins.
This is not an 8 core processor in the meaning of what marketing has done and some misleading to those people that don't understand the architecture. THIS IS A 4 CORE PROCESSOR WITH 4 PHYSICAL HYPER THREADING INTEGER CORES. the 2 integer cores of bulldozer only equals up to one intel integer core. bulldozer released, but something is wrong, the numbers are all over the place scoring better on one site then flopping on another, scoring decent and flopping another... as some people noticed it out scored a 2500k 60% of tests on ASROCK Fatality board, it also outscored the 2600k 30% of the time. All the ASUS board numbers are all over the place. sorry intel fan boys it's most likely that its a simple bios fix. Every test done that was not on an the CHV faired better scores than a 2600k and couldn't always beat the 2500k(single threaded apps)big deal in my opinion as when it came down to clowning intel was multitasking and intel severely got owned where they usually win. especially when this is absolutely new architecture ahead of its time(almost a full year) there is also a little known cache thrashing(software optimizations needed) clearly AMD is on track just little tweaks and improvements could get us an astoung first gen chip. Windows patches and bios updates may improve by total estimation of 5-7% more per core. a total of processor work would also be in the same improvement range. I did not expect this to absolutely kill on it's first outing. you could even consider ...
This is not an 8 core processor in the meaning of what marketing has done and some misleading to those people that don't understand the architecture. THIS IS A 4 CORE PROCESSOR WITH 4 PHYSICAL HYPER THREADING INTEGER CORES. the 2 integer cores of bulldozer only equals up to one intel integer core. bulldozer released, but something is wrong, the numbers are all over the place scoring better on one site then flopping on another, scoring decent and flopping another... as some people noticed it out scored a 2500k 60% of tests on ASROCK Fatality board, it also outscored the 2600k 30% of the time. All the ASUS board numbers are all over the place. sorry intel fan boys it's most likely that its a simple bios fix. Every test done that was not on an the CHV faired better scores than a 2600k and couldn't always beat the 2500k(single threaded apps)big deal in my opinion as when it came down to clowning intel was multitasking and intel severely got owned where they usually win. especially when this is absolutely new architecture ahead of its time(almost a full year) there is also a little known cache thrashing(software optimizations needed) clearly AMD is on track just little tweaks and improvements could get us an astoung first gen chip. Windows patches and bios updates may improve by total estimation of 5-7% more per core. a total of processor work would also be in the same improvement range. I did not expect this to absolutely kill on it's first outing. you could even consider ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment